2020-01: Revise AB620 Questions to Support LGBTQ

Request No.2020-01
Date of Request01-20-2020
RequesterMichael Quiaoit, CCCCO
CCC Academic Senate
Application(s)Standard / Noncredit
Section / Page

Demographic / Gender

Steering Hearing DateTBD
Proposed Change to Download FileTBD
Proposed Change to Residency LogicTBD


Problem / Issue

I just returned from the CCC LGBTQ+ Summit and they had a couple of questions on CCCApply I could not answer and shared that I would inquire and get back to them.


  • In the Demographic section when it asks about gender, why is the age 19 to answer and not 18? And
  • How can we make changes to the gender questions as it does not adequately reflect choices on the queer spectrum, so colleges will not get sufficient data on LGBTQ+ students?


I appreciate your prompt response. CO can assist with getting together an ad hoc workgroup to determine the correct gender choices as well. We can work with our LGBTQ+ advocates.


Thanks.

Michael R. Quiaoit

Dean, Educational Services and Support


Pending more information.  See email exchange attached and information from a 2015 LGBTQ change request that was deferred by the requesters.


Proposed Solution



Supporting Documentation

DescriptionFile TypeURLNotes
January 2020 Email thread with the CCCCOEmail PDFCCCApply Enhancements Email.pdf
CCCApply Gender & AB620 Changes 2015Google Sheethttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1C1GL7xZ0bY_1a9KDlrONYM9haUOmNCJv-CTHHoMOsL8/edit









Dependencies, Risks and/or Reporting Requirements?


Question

Yes

No

Which data field(s)?

What/How?

Would this change affect an existing question or data field on the Standard Application?
  •  
  •  


Would this change affect an existing question or data field on the International Application?
  •  


  •  
  •  


Would this change affect an existing question or data field on the Promise Grant Application?
  •  
  •  




Would Account (OpenCCC) data be affected by this change?
  •  
  •  


Does the question or data field align to an MIS reporting requirement now?
  •  
  •  


Does this change affect any other state or federal regulations or requirements?

  •  
  •  


Would this change affect existing residency logic?
  •  
  •  


Would any other data fields be affected by this change?
  •  
  •  


Would students users be affected by this change?
  •  
  •  


Would colleges be affected by this change? 
  •  
  •  


Would the Download Client be affected by this change?
  •  
  •  


What other tech center web services will be affected by this change?
  •  
  •  

i.e., Glue staging table?  Multiple Measur
Other dependencies?



Other implementation considerations?