Request No. | 2019-12 |
---|---|
Date of Request | January 30, 2019 |
Requester | Mitch Leahy, Santa Rosa Jr. College |
Application(s) | Standard Application |
Section / Page | Citizenship (Visa Table) |
Steering Hearing Date | TBD |
Proposed Change to Download File | No |
Proposed Change to Residency Logic | YES |
Problem / Issue
Mitch Leahy of SRJC brought an issue forward that is creating problems for their Admissions office regarding Visa types that SHOULD be used for residency eligibility but are currently NOT. These visa types now support residency across the system:
Proposed Solution
Update the Visa Types table to identify new or missing visa types that ARE eligible for residency determination (Integrity Flag 51).
Per the CACCRAO 2017 Residency Questionnaire - the following visa types ARE eligible for residency determination and should be included in the existing residency logic ( Patty to find the specific logic area and step ):
Dependencies, Risks and/or Reporting Requirements?
Question | Yes | No | Which data field(s)? | What/How? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Would this change affect an existing question or data field on the Standard Application? | ||||
Would this change affect an existing question or data field on the International Application? | ||||
Would this change affect an existing question or data field on the Promise Grant Application? | ||||
Would Account (OpenCCC) data be affected by this change? | ||||
Does the question or data field align to an MIS reporting requirement now? | ||||
Does this change affect any other state or federal regulations or requirements? | ||||
Would this change affect existing residency logic? | ||||
Would any other data fields be affected by this change? | ||||
Would students users be affected by this change? | ||||
Would colleges be affected by this change? | ||||
Would the Download Client be affected by this change? | ||||
What other tech center web services will be affected by this change? | i.e., Glue staging table? Multiple Measur | |||
Other dependencies? | ||||
Other implementation considerations? |
Supporting Documentation
Description | File Type | URL | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Mitch's post in the College Support Site: Visa types not allows students to answer California residency questions
Program Change Request:
When a visa type is a visa type that allows a student to establish residence (Integrity Flag = 51) the application is not asking the Residency page questions. (See below: Notes for CA Resident For Two Years.)
This occurred a few years ago when students entered Other and No Documents. The student would come in with their USCIS documentation and we couldn’t just supplement the application because they had not answered the Residency page questions. It was requested that the student always be asked the Residency page questions and the program was updated. (See below: Notes for No Documents)
For all students, no matter what their citizenship status is, we always need the Residency page questions to be answered so that when a student brings proof of their citizenship/visa type we can just supplement their application with their citizenship/visa USCIS documentation. A sample visa type to test in CCCApply is "H-1"
2016:
California Resident for Two Years
Data Element: ca_res_2_years
Description: Applicant’s response regarding residence in California since two years before RDD.
Format, Length: boolean, 1
Values: 1 = True/Yes
0 = False/No
Allows Null: Yes
Default: None
Usage:
Notes: Not asked when Citizenship Status makes Residency page unnecessary.
residency table
No Documents
Data Element: no_documents
Description: Applicant has checked box for No Documents
Format, Length: boolean, 1
values: 1 = True/Yes 0 = False/No
Allows Null: Yes
Default: None
Usage:
Notes: residency table
Xap Field: noDocuments
Revision Log: ~~
Question Text: [checkbox] No Documents
Conditions: Appears only if Citizenship Status is ‘Other’
Additional Text: None
Response Options: Checked or Unchecked.
Pop-Up Help: None
Field Error Check: None
Page Error Check: If checked, visa_type is disabled and set to no selection
Notes: None