Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »


Description


The CCCApply Residency Review Committee is an ongoing advisory committee to support and advise the CCCApply product manager and steering committee on residency related issues and change requests that affect the CCCApply residency algorithm in the Standard Application.

With revisions underway to update the 2005 CCCApply Steering Bylaws & Constitution, the Steering Committee has determined that the CCCApply residency algorithm (Standard Application) should be reviewed to ensure it is up-to-date, accurate, and is compliant with the California Education Code, the CCCCO Student Admissions Accounting Manual (SAAM), and the CACCRAO standards for residency.



2018 Objectives


The primary objectives for this advisory committee in 2018 are to: 

Understand the four Areas (A, B, C, and D) and criteria in the current (2017) CCCApply residency algorithm;

Ensure current algorithm is in compliance with local, state and federal residency rules and regulations;

Advise and support the CCCApply product manager, as needed, as subject matter experts to ensure all change requests, issues, bugs, and other application-related changes are implemented correctly; and 

Provide guidance interpreting new legislation that may affect or change onscreen questions, new or existing data fields, and logic as needed in the  the Standard Application. 



Open Issues - Pending Items

CR #
Description
Steering Review Date
New Data Fields / New Logic
Scheduled Release Date
Status - Release Notes Link
2018-R1Research Project #1: Conduct comprehensive review of current residency algorithm in CCCApply Standard Application.January 2018N/AN/AResearch Analysis Only
2018-R2Research Project #2: Review the AB540 algorithm currently used in CCCApply & CCPG applicationsJanuary 2018N/AN/AResearch Only
2018-R3Research Project #3: Review the residency determination questions on the Application Year page in the Promise Grant (BOG) Application.January 2018N/AN/AResearch Only
2017-08Revise Residency Logic for HS Freshmen

December 6, 2016



Review NEW

2017-12Display Residency Page Even if User is a Visa Holder4-23-17CCCApplyApril 26, 2017Review NEW







Additional Information

#DescriptionLink

In 2016, CCCApply Steering Committee reviewed a request to have the CCCApply residency algorithm logic - and corresponding Table E: Integrity Flags - reviewed for accuracy, consistency, by an outside expert/consultant. After short discussion on the importance of having an outside source conduct an objective review, the committee voted to seek funding to cover the project. Bill Mulrooney, former Steering Chair, suggested we consult a former steering member (Tim Clow) to perform the review. 

Update: 
Unfortunately funding for a review was not budgeted in the 2017/2018 fiscal year and the steering committee has undergone massive turnover (over a dozen members have retired and left the committee since September 2017).

  • Steering leadership suggested we resurrect the Residency Review Committee (inactive since 2015) and assign them this project.
  • This review will also benefit the CCCApply 3.0 product development team in gathering requirements and stories supporting innovations & upgrades to the existing residency algorithm. 
  • Based on the findings, consider a formal external review. 






  • No labels